Tuesday, March 18, 2008
It's that time of year again...
Time to reveal my bracket for this year's NCAA tournament! Last year I used the Washington Post's bracket contest, but after using Yahoo Sports' NFL-prediction system last season, I went back to Yahoo for my bracket this year.
Friday, March 14, 2008
At the corner of Update Street and Web Site Avenue
In case you haven't noticed, the strip is back to normal now. Today, however, I want to add something else to the web site.
The Internet is an amazing place. When I discovered that there were sites dedicated to nothing but obsessing over America's roads and highways, I became convinced that there was a website for anything on the Internet. So when I couldn't find a site cataloguing street signs in the same way as roads - something that can show a lot of variety - I decided to make one.
(Can someone tell Freehostia that I'd really love a way to select several files at once for upload rather than have to go through Browse box after Browse box? I'm sure FTP would be one way that's already in place but I fear complications...)
Also, I made a new addition to the Around the Horn Drinking Game.
The Internet is an amazing place. When I discovered that there were sites dedicated to nothing but obsessing over America's roads and highways, I became convinced that there was a website for anything on the Internet. So when I couldn't find a site cataloguing street signs in the same way as roads - something that can show a lot of variety - I decided to make one.
(Can someone tell Freehostia that I'd really love a way to select several files at once for upload rather than have to go through Browse box after Browse box? I'm sure FTP would be one way that's already in place but I fear complications...)
Also, I made a new addition to the Around the Horn Drinking Game.
Labels:
sports in general,
street signs,
web site news
Wednesday, March 12, 2008
Wait until you meet their sister.
Tuesday, March 11, 2008
Hmm. This could be a problem.
I don't know if anyone else is having this problem, but they probably are; the strip is currently returning a "can't connect to MySQL site" error. I can access the database but it's not loading on the page itself. Well, when it comes back there'll be a new strip.
If it's still down in the morning I'll post the strip on Da Blog.
If it's still down in the morning I'll post the strip on Da Blog.
The guv hires prostitutes? Big deal.
Let's say you're on a business trip, and you get lonely so you decide to hire a prostitute. But you like the girls you know back home, so you decide to place a call to your pimp back home, offering to pay for the whore's transport to wherever you are in addition to your usual fee. Does it bend the law? Maybe. Does it mean you're not fit for your job, even if you're, say, a project manager and expected to lead? Probably not. Does it make you a horribly immoral person? Well, not that much more immoral than hiring a prostitute in the first place, which if you believe some people, is not much different from marijuana. Should you be run out of your job and disgraced for life regardless of how good a job you did before? If you used company funds, maybe; but if you paid with your own money it's not even the company's business.
But if you're the governor of New York? Apparently it's a different story.
I've been reading about the Elliot Spitzer scandal and beyond the hypocrital irony, I'm seeing a distinct disconnect. I'm not seeing how "patronized a prostitution ring" exactly equates to "is a corrupt politician" or, considering just how popular it really is, "is a reprehensible person". If he used campaign or state funds to pay for his "night of fun", or if he lied under oath about it or actively tried to obstruct the investigation instead of semi-fessing up, I could see the scandal, but if it's about doing something that any red-blooded American of the same gender would do (well, most)?
Doesn't this only show that Spitzer is (gasp!) actually human and not a perfect little saint? Do we actually expect our politicians to be the latter? Considering how many corrupt, truly reprehensible politicians there are out there, shouldn't we be focusing on more important things for us to get upset about our politicians? JFK was anything but a saint, after all.
Really, aren't there more important things for the media to talk about? I would think the damage the Bush administration has done over the past seven years is far more important than a governor's sexual escapades. Bill Clinton, after all, had sex outside marriage while in an executive office, and I would say it didn't affect his ability to be president too negatively, would you?
But if you're the governor of New York? Apparently it's a different story.
I've been reading about the Elliot Spitzer scandal and beyond the hypocrital irony, I'm seeing a distinct disconnect. I'm not seeing how "patronized a prostitution ring" exactly equates to "is a corrupt politician" or, considering just how popular it really is, "is a reprehensible person". If he used campaign or state funds to pay for his "night of fun", or if he lied under oath about it or actively tried to obstruct the investigation instead of semi-fessing up, I could see the scandal, but if it's about doing something that any red-blooded American of the same gender would do (well, most)?
Doesn't this only show that Spitzer is (gasp!) actually human and not a perfect little saint? Do we actually expect our politicians to be the latter? Considering how many corrupt, truly reprehensible politicians there are out there, shouldn't we be focusing on more important things for us to get upset about our politicians? JFK was anything but a saint, after all.
Really, aren't there more important things for the media to talk about? I would think the damage the Bush administration has done over the past seven years is far more important than a governor's sexual escapades. Bill Clinton, after all, had sex outside marriage while in an executive office, and I would say it didn't affect his ability to be president too negatively, would you?
Thursday, March 6, 2008
Apparently he rolled a save of 1. (If you get it, and you've already heard this, you're probably groaning.)
Gary Gygax, co-creator of Dungeons and Dragons, died on Tuesday. If, like me, you weren't around in the 80s when D&D was one of the biggest fads on the planet, you've probably never heard of him, and if you're neither a fan nor one of those "D&D=Satanism" freaks, you probably think it only matters to antisocial geeks. You'd be wrong.
Freehostia's security certificate is back to normal. Since today's strip is up really late, tomorrow's will be up around noon PT, Saturday's will be up as early in the morning as possible, and Sunday's will be back to being up at 11 PM PT.
Freehostia's security certificate is back to normal. Since today's strip is up really late, tomorrow's will be up around noon PT, Saturday's will be up as early in the morning as possible, and Sunday's will be back to being up at 11 PM PT.
Sunday, March 2, 2008
Expect delays when reading comicked strips
The next strip will not be up until sometime in the morning, possibly as late as 11 AM PT, though more likely no later than 8. This is because Freehostia's security certificate has a problem, and while I ignored it long enough to get a strip up last night, I don't want to risk it causing any real problems.
UPDATE 12:24 PM PT: The new strip is finally up, though Freehostia is not back to normal (though it may just be IE7's cache). Tomorrow's strip will go up no earlier than 8 AM PT, and strips will continue to go up at around noon PT until Freehostia is back to normal. If it's not back to normal by one week from today, I'm going to be seriously considering dumping Freehostia.
UPDATE 12:24 PM PT: The new strip is finally up, though Freehostia is not back to normal (though it may just be IE7's cache). Tomorrow's strip will go up no earlier than 8 AM PT, and strips will continue to go up at around noon PT until Freehostia is back to normal. If it's not back to normal by one week from today, I'm going to be seriously considering dumping Freehostia.
Monday, February 25, 2008
Sandsday Feedback Open Thread
I want you to check out my comic strip and tell me what you think. What do you think of the strip so far? What do I do well? What are your suggestions for getting better? Any questions or comments you may have on the strip are fair game.
(I've linked to this page from the strip so anyone who reads the strip is likely to be drawn here.)
I absolutely welcome ideas for specific strips, but I prefer that ideas I might use not be presented in a public forum before I use them. You can post them here, but I prefer if you e-mail me at mwmailsea at yahoo dot com.
Comment away!
(I've linked to this page from the strip so anyone who reads the strip is likely to be drawn here.)
I absolutely welcome ideas for specific strips, but I prefer that ideas I might use not be presented in a public forum before I use them. You can post them here, but I prefer if you e-mail me at mwmailsea at yahoo dot com.
Comment away!
Sunday, February 24, 2008
Thoughts on the Oscars
It seems very odd to me that the 50th Grammys, the 50th Daytona 500, and the 80th Academy Awards would all fall in the same year, indeed the same month.
I watched two of the three, and the broadcasts of the latter two made sure to reflect on the historic nature of the moment. Before the presentation of the acting awards and Best Director, the Oscars showed montages of presentations and acceptance speeches past.
I honestly don't have much to say about the awards themselves, though I am glad that, for the most part, the awards themselves are the focus of the Oscars, unlike some awards shows I know.
I did see one interesting tidbit on Tim Dirks' Filmsite: Every one of the Best Picture nominees could be classified as an independent, low-budget film. In fact, by Dirks' count this was the third straight year where the Best Picture nominees were bankrolled outside the big-budget studio system.
There has always been a disconnect between the popular films and the critically-acclaimed best films that win Oscars. Could we be seeing the start of another disconnect - one that could start seeing big studio films disenfranchised from the big awards at Oscar time? Could the Oscars start doting over indy films like mad? Could it become little more than a film festival?
Not to say the nominees were overly artsy, or even unpopular. Lord knows I've seen plenty of ads for Michael Clayton, No Country for Old Men, or There Will Be Blood. From what little I know of them, those movies deserve every inch of praise they get. There's no real danger of Best Picture going to a film as artsy as, say, The Seventh Seal in the near future.
Well, at least let's hope not.
In any case, this seems as good a time as any to plug my 100 Greatest Movies Project, an attempt to present the definitive list of greatest movies by combining all the lists that have come before. It will be a celebration of the history of film and a chance to find out what really makes a great film. If you consider yourself a movie buff, a true movie buff that appreciates true greatness in film, consider writing for the Project (with full credits) and bringing some of the great films to life. If you're interested, e-mail me at mwmailsea at yahoo dot com or comment on this post.
I watched two of the three, and the broadcasts of the latter two made sure to reflect on the historic nature of the moment. Before the presentation of the acting awards and Best Director, the Oscars showed montages of presentations and acceptance speeches past.
I honestly don't have much to say about the awards themselves, though I am glad that, for the most part, the awards themselves are the focus of the Oscars, unlike some awards shows I know.
I did see one interesting tidbit on Tim Dirks' Filmsite: Every one of the Best Picture nominees could be classified as an independent, low-budget film. In fact, by Dirks' count this was the third straight year where the Best Picture nominees were bankrolled outside the big-budget studio system.
There has always been a disconnect between the popular films and the critically-acclaimed best films that win Oscars. Could we be seeing the start of another disconnect - one that could start seeing big studio films disenfranchised from the big awards at Oscar time? Could the Oscars start doting over indy films like mad? Could it become little more than a film festival?
Not to say the nominees were overly artsy, or even unpopular. Lord knows I've seen plenty of ads for Michael Clayton, No Country for Old Men, or There Will Be Blood. From what little I know of them, those movies deserve every inch of praise they get. There's no real danger of Best Picture going to a film as artsy as, say, The Seventh Seal in the near future.
Well, at least let's hope not.
In any case, this seems as good a time as any to plug my 100 Greatest Movies Project, an attempt to present the definitive list of greatest movies by combining all the lists that have come before. It will be a celebration of the history of film and a chance to find out what really makes a great film. If you consider yourself a movie buff, a true movie buff that appreciates true greatness in film, consider writing for the Project (with full credits) and bringing some of the great films to life. If you're interested, e-mail me at mwmailsea at yahoo dot com or comment on this post.
Saturday, February 23, 2008
A word for anyone who wants to see more than just a particular day's strip
Could you please make sure you have cookies turned on until further notice? Or at least have it set up so that Bravenet won't idiotically count it as a separate hit every time you look back through the archive? I swear, once SiteMeter gets this "multiple counters on one account" thing nailed down I will run away from Bravenet so fast it'll make your head spin...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
