New rankings and other errata

You know what I just realized? The 2004 Auburn and Utah titles are going to be unified at the Sugar Bowl. Meanwhile, the BCS Title Game won't involve an undefeated team and neither team holds any lineal title. Arkansas will defend its Princeton Title at the Cotton Bowl ("Just a few days ago, Missouri was playing for a spot in the BCS Championship game. While unsuccessful in that match, they did manage to get into another National Championship Game," writes HeavyweightFootballChamps.com), and Illinois will defend the 2007 Boise State title in the Rose Bowl. I'm not sure if I should create a new lineal title or not. Heaven knows that both the Princeton and 2004 Auburn titles managed to stay in the SEC all year without being unified, so if Ohio State and Illinois both win their conferences, there's no guarantee any imaginary "2007 BCS Championship" title would be instantly unified with 2007 Boise State. If LSU wins, and the two SEC titleholders win their bowls, it's a lot less likely that LSU will completely escape winning a lineal title, or at least its lineage escaping being unified with one.

On the other hand, they may be being forced into going 12 rounds, but nothing's stopping the Patriots and its run with the NFL Lineal Title, as shown by the latest logo to be X'ed out. But there are definitely concerns. This is now two straight weeks the Pats have been taken to the wire... by a mediocre team. The Steelers are no mediocre team. The Pats' struggles have shown their defense to be porous against the run, and the Steelers have Willie Parker. And the New Steel Curtain just might be up to the task of stopping Tom Brady.

So the Steelers have no chance.

Maybe I've been watching too much wrestling, but New England is going to basically crush the Steelers - and I had been thinking about picking the Steelers just to stop the winning at some point. The point spread, I've heard, is -10 New England; I am guaranteeing that the Pats are going to cover and win by at least that much, or I don't know what I'll do. Maybe you could suggest something.

Other news and notes:

• WHY do people keep hyping the fall of the Lions as some sort of "return to reality"? ALL FOUR TEAMS THEY'VE LOST TO IN THIS STREAK ARE LEGIT PLAYOFF CONTENDERS, EVEN THE CARDINALS! No wonder the college football polls don't take strength of schedule into account (unless it helps them hose a non-BCS team), because no one else in any sport does either! Granted, you can say the same thing about the remaining four opponents, but I still believe in the 10-win guarantee, I'm sticking with it to the end, and win or lose I'm still picking the Lions over the Chargers and Chiefs.
• It's Chicago's turn to win this week. And I'm picking the Redskins to lose for the rest of the season. Exactly what line has the Redskins as a favorite? The Redskins do have the SuperPower Ranking edge, but only barely, so no Upset Special.
• Picking Houston over Tampa Bay at home as the Upset Special, as the Bucs may be the creation of a weak schedule. A second upset special has the Cardinals beating the Seahawks, as I'm taking that stat from last time and picking the Cards over all >.500 teams (and likely making that the, or at least an, Upset Special) and against them when facing a <.500 team. I might - might - make an exception for the Pats or Dolphins.