So earlier today I heard Michael Wilbon claim on PTI you have to put Federer ahead of Sampras because the tiebreaker is that Federer won the French and Sampras didn't.
Um, NO. Sampras got the same number of Grand Slams as Federer against better competition, and you can't begrudge him never winning the French because of that. ESPECIALLY since the only reason Federer won the French is because Nadal crapped out.
Get it? Got it? Good.