So I'm watching the NBA Dunk Contest and I see Dwight Howard put on a Superman getup and cape and try a dunk and everyone is proclaiming it the greatest dunk ever while the judges are giving it all 10s, and I'm thinking, How is it the greatest dunk ever WHEN IT WASN'T EVEN A DUNK?
So today I'm watching ESPN and I'm hearing that other people are pointing out it wasn't a dunk and I'm relieved that other people feel the same way I do. And just now I hear ESPN Radio's Mike and Mike on SportsCenter claiming it wasn't a dunk because it was somehow BETTER than a dunk!
And that snaps it into focus for me. No one's getting at my REAL problem with this "dunk". Namely, that even if it was a dunk it's not that great of one.
First, let's consider why it ended up not being a dunk. Namely, he doesn't quite fly enough to reach the rim, so he has to throw it the rest of the way and hope it goes in. He not-dunks it because he's not good enough to real-dunk it! Now, you might say he throws it with such force and power that that's what Mike and Mike meant by saying it was better than a dunk. You're entitled to your opinion. But WHEN YOU PUT ON A SUPERMAN CAPE IN A COMPETITION THAT REWARDS HIGH FLYING, I EXPECT TO BELIEVE YOU CAN FLY! IF YOU CAN'T EVEN REACH THE RIM, THE SUPERMAN CAPE HAS ONLY CREATED HIGHER EXPECTATIONS AND IS ACTUALLY A DETRIMENT TO MY OPINION TO YOU! IF YOU'RE GOING TO PUT ON A SUPERMAN CAPE THE LEAST YOU COULD DO IS ACTUALLY REACH THE RIM!
Second, let's say he DOES reach the rim and throw it down. Take away the Superman cape and what do you have? A rather pedestrian dunk! So far as I can tell he wasn't intending to do anything special with the ball. He was going to catch it, head up to the rim, and dunk it. It's essentially the basic alley oop with a running start. There is no way that cuts it in the dunk contest! That's about as basic a dunk as you can have when you have someone passing you the ball! That's not worthy of all 10s by a long shot!
(By contrast, how does Gerald Green's cupcake dunk not only fail to get all 10s from the judges, but actually receive an EIGHT from Darryl Dawkins? Darryl's a hater! Darryl's a hater!)
Also, TNT is owned by Time Warner. Superman is owned by DC Comics which is owned by Time Warner. I don't think that's a coincidence. At the very least it helps explain why the "dunk's" shortcomings were ignored entirely by the TNT crew. I guarantee you that if he'd put a Spiderman costume on, the TNT crew would not be creaming themselves nearly as much over the "dunk".
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
2 comments:
seriously?
what, you want noname o'noname and jimmy mcwhocares in the final of an exhibition? I'd rather have dwight howard
I thought Howard clearly outplayed Green in the final, and not just because Green basically stopped trying. The Superman dunk was actually Howard's worst dunk of the night, and the only one not deserving of all 10s.
Though your complaint seems to be that you only want the stars to be in the dunk contest, which first, suggests a certain closedmindedness, and second, I suppose you probably want the dunk contest to just be the LeBron Jameses and Steve Nashes of the world? Do you remember when it was called the "Sprite Rising Stars Slam Dunk"?
Quite frankly, I don't care who's in the dunk contest, because the dunk contest is about the dunks, not the players.
Post a Comment